Cass Sunstein--Obama's right hand man!

CASS SUNSTEIN--Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.

He looks harmless

Cass Sunstein at first sight has some very impressive credentials.  But you have to listen closely to his ideology and it becomes a little more frightening.  In his 2001 book, Republic.com, he argued that the Internet may weaken democracy because it allows citizens to isolate themselves within groups that share their own views and experiences, and thus cut themselves off from any information that might challenge their beliefs, a phenomenon known as cyberbalkanization. 

He wants to rewrite the Constitution to allow for ‘mandatory or compulsory diversity of views in every medium of public communication’.

He wants a panel of government ‘experts’ to oversee what radio and TV puts out, to make sure they rigidly keep to a revamped ‘Fairness Doctrine’, by offering freedom of speech to everybody. In Sunstein’s language, that includes everyone who wants to subvert America from a government-approved angle, but not Christians or anyone who criticises government!

Sunstein’s basic idea is to silence anti-government statements, or, alternatively, to tax them. This is just cover-up speke for calling anything against Obama ‘conspiracy theory’, and putting a stop to it. By calling valid criticism ‘conspiracy theory’ and then making it illegal, Sunstein can stop the mouths of everyone from political candidates to sitting Senators and congressmen, to ordinary individuals who write blogs. He will really come to get you! 

The tyranny can also percolate downwards to anyone in the street who happens to say they dislike Obama and think he’s a cheat and liar. It is an exact reproduction of what happened in Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany, and still goes on in China. It is also like the mandatory violent controls in total-Islam countries. 

Marriage

In a recent book, Sunstein proposes that government recognition of marriage be discontinued. "Under our proposal, the word marriage would no longer appear in any laws, and marriage licenses would no longer be offered or recognized by any level of government," argues Sunstein. He continues, "the only legal status states would confer on couples would be a civil union, which would be a domestic partnership agreement between any two people." He goes on further, "Governments would not be asked to endorse any particular relationships by conferring on them the term marriage," and refers to state-recognized marriage as an "official license scheme."

Check it out--do your own research.  There's more!

Happy Hunting!

According to Cass . . . this blog entry should be silenced.  If not silenced--at least TAXED!